In this exclusive presentation of Big Ideas, an international team of scholars looks at the persistent problem of anti-semitism. To what extent is the problem endemic? Does it still exist in Canada? And if so, what steps can be taken to deal with it? This episode of Big Ideas was shot at the University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies. Dozens of scholars from around the world gathered to discuss how prevalent anti-semitism is today, and how it has changed over time. Steven Zipperstein is the Daniel E. Koshland Professor in Jewish Culture and History at Stanford University. He argues that antisemitism may in fact be an endemic problem with no sign of disappearing in the future. In this look at the historical origins of antisemitic thought, Zipperstein argues that while antisemitism has changed over the years, it hasn't disappeared. And with the emergence of the state of Israel, it's taken on an entirely new form. Todd Endelman teaches at the University of Michigan, where he's the William Haber Professor of Modern Jewish History, and Director of the Frankel Center for Judaic Studies. In his talk, Endelman argues that while antisemitism may have largely disappeared (or at least gone underground) in North America, for Jews in Europe, it's still very much a part of life. But Endelman suggests that for a variety of reasons, today's anti-semitism is very different from that of the past, appealing to an entirely different type of person for entirely different reasons. Finally, Michael Marrus looks at the reality of anti-semitism today. Looking specifically at France as a test case, Marrus argues it's very difficult to measure whether more people are committing anti-semitic acts, or whether it's due to a small number of increasingly-dedicated anti-semites. Marrus also suggests antisemitism is at least partly an expression of traditional European xenophobia, and that Europe's attempts to deal with its more visible Muslim minority may force it to deal with Jews differently. Michael Marrus is Dean of the University of Toronto's School of Graduate Studies, holds the Chancellor Rose and Ray Wolfe Chair in Holocaust Studies and has advised the Vatican on the responsibility of the Catholic church for the Holocaust.

Jordan Peterson, University of Toronto professor of psychology talks about fear of the unknown and fear of dealing with problems.

John O'Leary is the president of Frontier College, an organization which historically took to the wilds of Canada in order to teach working men and women how to read. In this talk, O'Leary looks back at the history of the college as well as the current challenges it faces in bringing literacy to the new frontier -- Canada's inner cities. Robert Logan is a noted physicist ... which might make him seem an unlikely choice to address a conference on the future of literacy. But Logan is also author of The Alphabet Effect, an influential book which argues that one reason for the rise of `Western' science is our alphabet. That the ability to think symbolically arose from our language, and drove technological advance. Logan looks not only at the origins of technological innovation, but also how literacy alters the way we think. Part 2: George Steiner George Steiner is one of the world's leading literary theorists. In this talk, Steiner addresses the fundamental questions of literacy: what does it mean to be `literate'? Does literacy always correlate to intelligence? And are we really moving into a post-literate age, or will we always cling to literacy? All three talks were delivered to the Living Literacies conference at York University.

Part 1 - Lectures - Dr . Steven Pinker . Are we really born a blank slate? Dr. Pinker uses his book - "The Blank Slate" - to explore the idea of human nature and its moral, emotional, and political colorings Part 2 - lectures- Dr. Leon Kass, Chair of the President's Council on Bioethics, examines the distinct ethical dilemmas that surround stem cell research. Dr. Kass will address a fundamental philosophical question underlying these latest scientific advances: Why not immortality?